planner: add regression coverage for issue 67345#67390
planner: add regression coverage for issue 67345#67390hawkingrei wants to merge 1 commit intopingcap:masterfrom
Conversation
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Repository UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughA new regression test case for issue 67345 was added to verify correct query planning behavior with complex Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~8 minutes Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Warning There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool's configuration or disable the tool if it's a critical failure. 🔧 golangci-lint (2.11.4)Command failed Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
|
@hawkingrei: The following test failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #67390 +/- ##
================================================
- Coverage 77.7922% 77.5076% -0.2846%
================================================
Files 2023 1943 -80
Lines 556481 543256 -13225
================================================
- Hits 432899 421065 -11834
- Misses 121834 122189 +355
+ Partials 1748 2 -1746
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
What problem does this PR solve?
Issue Number: ref #67345
Problem Summary:
#67345reports an internal error for a query that combines aVIEWwith a coercion-heavyWHEREpredicate.Fresh current master no longer reproduces the panic, and the strongest overlap points to the merged fix in
#66893.This PR adds regression coverage so the non-repro behavior stays locked in.
What changed and how does it work?
issue:67345regression block topkg/planner/core/issuetest/planner_issue_test.goEXPLAINSELECTSELECT ... WHERE ref2Check List
Tests
Side effects
Documentation
Release note
Summary by CodeRabbit